polymorph self

2017-03-14 07:59:13 UTC

with this stuff?

Discussion:

(too old to reply)

polymorph self

2017-03-14 07:59:13 UTC

with this stuff?

Joachim

2017-03-14 14:33:08 UTC

of course you can't. It's obvious that a lot more users fit into 64 bits than into 32 bits. If you want to scale, you better go 128 or even 32k bits.

polymorph self

2017-03-15 22:15:19 UTC

of course you can't. It's obvious that a lot more users fit into 64 bits than into 32 bits. If you want to scale, you better go 128 or even 32k bits.

Andrew Glynn

2017-03-16 00:24:34 UTC

of course you can't. It's obvious that a lot more users fit into 64 bits than into 32 bits. If you want to scale, you better go 128 or even 32k bits.

polymorph self

2017-03-21 12:03:31 UTC

of course you can't. It's obvious that a lot more users fit into 64 bits than into 32 bits. If you want to scale, you better go 128 or even 32k bits.

polymorph self

2017-04-13 15:02:48 UTC

of course you can't. It's obvious that a lot more users fit into 64 bits than into 32 bits. If you want to scale, you better go 128 or even 32k bits.

Loading...